Cboe BZX · NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF news

$54.60−0.46%
Close Sep 29, 2026 · split-adjusted
Articles · 30 days0English, de-duplicated
Positive0
Neutral0
Negative0

About ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

ProShares vs. iShares: Is NOBL or HDV the Better Dividend ETF for Investors?
The Motley FoolJul 9, 7:34 AM ETNeutral

NOBL is presented as a viable option with merit (lower stock turnover, consistent dividend growth requirement), but is less favorable compared to HDV due to higher expense ratio (0.35%), lower dividend yield (2.07%), higher beta (0.74), and larger drawdown (17.9%), though it has delivered similar long-term returns.

Higher Yield or Long-Term Dividend Growth? FDVV vs. NOBL
The Motley FoolApr 29, 2:04 PM ET▲ Positive

NOBL offers a more conservative, defensive approach with a focus on dividend consistency through 25+ years of consecutive dividend growth. While lower yield and higher expense ratio are drawbacks, its equal-weighted structure and emphasis on stability appeal to investors prioritizing long-term reliability over aggressive growth.

NOBL vs. VYMI: Which Dividend ETF Is a Better Buy?
The Motley FoolApr 20, 10:30 AM ET▼ Negative

NOBL is presented as the inferior choice with higher expense ratio (0.35%), lower diversification (69 stocks), underperformance versus VYMI over 5 years (22% vs 49%), and lower dividend yield (2.59% vs 3.64%). The author explicitly recommends VYMI over NOBL.

Could Investing $10,000 in NOBL Make You a Millionaire?
The Motley FoolMar 28, 5:23 PM ETNeutral

While NOBL has delivered solid 11.1% average annual returns and could theoretically create millionaires over decades, it has significantly underperformed the S&P 500 both in the past year (2.8% vs 15%) and since inception (156% vs 292%). The fund is presented as suitable for conservative, income-focused investors but not for those seeking market-beating returns.

VIG vs NOBL: Which Dividend ETF Should You Buy Now?
The Motley FoolMar 22, 11:34 AM ETNeutral

NOBL offers a focused, equally-weighted approach with higher dividend yield (2%) and invests exclusively in elite Dividend Aristocrats with proven 25+ year dividend growth records. However, it underperformed VIG significantly over 1 and 5 years and carries higher fees, making it suitable only for specific income-focused strategies.

Fidelity (FDVV) vs. ProShares (NOBL): Which Dividend ETF Reigns Supreme?
The Motley FoolMar 15, 5:18 PM ET▲ Positive

NOBL is presented as a stable, defensive alternative with blue-chip holdings and consistent dividend growth (8.4% annually). The author personally recommends NOBL for investors with existing tech exposure, citing its counter-positioning and portfolio diversification benefits.

VYM vs. NOBL: Which Dividend-Focused ETF Delivers a Higher Yield and Lower Fees?
The Motley FoolFeb 11, 10:37 AM ETNeutral

NOBL is presented as a viable alternative for investors seeking concentrated exposure to established dividend growers with 25+ years of dividend growth history, despite higher fees (0.35%), lower yield (2.0%), and lower historical returns. It offers a different investment approach rather than being inferior.

Also mentions NOBL

Articles that tag NOBL but are mainly about other companies.

4 (More) Dividend ETFs Worth Holding for the Long Haul
The Motley FoolAug 18, 12:30 AM ET▲ Positive

Highlighted as one of the purest dividend growth funds, targeting companies with 25+ years of consecutive dividend increases, representing durable and mature U.S. companies with strong cash flows.

Could Investing $2,000 in the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF Make You a Millionaire?
The Motley FoolMar 10, 12:30 PM ET▲ Positive

The ETF is praised for stability, consistent dividend growth (43-year average), and outperformance during volatile markets. However, sentiment is tempered by acknowledgment that long-term returns (10.6% over 10 years) lag the S&P 500 (15.1%), and it's recommended as a portfolio component rather than standalone investment.

Articles and sentiment ratings from Massive / Polygon. Sentiment is the provider's model rating for this company, not Gainbot's view.

Sources: Massive / Polygon daily aggregates (split-adjusted) · SEC filings via Massive · FINRA settlements via Massive · Financial Modeling Prep. Figures are dated where shown; research is informational, not investment advice. Methodology