Recommended as the better buy due to lower expense ratio (0.37%), superior 5-year returns (15.9% annualized), lower volatility (max drawdown -20%), and more stable performance over longer time horizons.
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF news
About iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
The fund offers solid exposure to established aerospace and defense leaders but suffers from high concentration risk with top 3 holdings representing 45% of the portfolio. While it has generated positive 5-year returns ($2,118 on $1,000), its lower beta (0.78) and higher max drawdown vulnerability make it a less balanced option compared to its peer.
Recommended as the better choice for most investors due to lower expense ratio (0.37%), established holdings, lower volatility (19.5% max drawdown), and broader diversification across 50 stocks including GE Aerospace, RTX, and Boeing.
The ETF receives a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy) rating, has a competitive low expense ratio of 0.37%, substantial assets under management of $12.68 billion, and solid year-to-date performance of 6.54%. It is recommended as an excellent option for investors seeking sector exposure.
Offers diversified exposure to 48 U.S. aerospace and defense companies; gained 8.5% year-to-date; holds Zacks ETF Rank #2 (Buy) with $13.94 billion in net assets.
ITA is recommended as the better investment choice with lower expense ratio (0.37%), higher 1-year return (22.9%), lower volatility (beta 0.74), larger AUM ($14.2B), and superior long-term performance (27.6% annualized 3-year return). The fund's focus on stable defense contractors and large-cap manufacturers provides consistent growth.
Established fund with 20 years of history, lower expense ratio (0.38%), higher AUM ($14.7B) for better liquidity, modest dividend yield (0.4%), strong one-year return (33%), and well-known holdings. Positioned as the conservative, cost-effective choice for income-oriented investors.
Lower expense ratio, stronger 1-year returns (32.5%), established fund with 13% annualized returns since 2006, lower volatility (beta 0.81), and lower 2-year drawdown make it a steady, proven investment option.
Positioned as the established, dependable choice with lower expense ratio (0.38%), significantly higher liquidity ($13.6B AUM), and exposure to proven defense contractors. Recommended for investors seeking straightforward, battle-tested sector exposure.
ITA offers higher dividend yield (0.49%), provides concentrated exposure to industry leaders, and is suitable for conservative investors seeking stable income and lower volatility through established companies like GE Aerospace, RTX, and Boeing.
Also mentions ITA
Articles that tag ITA but are mainly about other companies.
Supported by ongoing geopolitical tensions, military weapons depletion, and government prioritization of defense spending and modernization with durable demand profile.
Currently down 18.4% from 52-week high due to election concerns, but historical data suggests recovery within six months post-midterm. The ETF represents the broader sector which may face near-term headwinds but has shown resilience historically.
Presented as an alternative option with similar expense ratio (0.37%) and largest assets ($12.01B), but no performance comparison or recommendation is made.
Diversified fund of 50 aerospace and defense companies with Lockheed Martin as fourth-largest holding (5.59%), providing balanced exposure to the sector.
Recommended as a superior alternative with the largest assets ($11.87 billion) and lowest expense ratio (0.37%), tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index
Largest defense ETF with $11.96 billion in assets, offering broad exposure to 50 companies. Well-positioned to capture sector growth from NATO spending and contract awards.
Provides diversified exposure to defense contractors (RTX 15.99%, BA 7.71%, LMT 4.59%) positioned to benefit from increased Saudi defense spending
Mentioned as another alternative with $11.93 billion in assets and a 0.37% expense ratio. Like PPA, it is presented as a comparable option without performance commentary, warranting a neutral stance.
Presented as a competitive alternative with the lowest expense ratio (0.37%) and largest asset base ($11.88 billion) among the three ETFs compared.
Holds 7.48% exposure to Boeing, benefiting from Boeing's major contract wins and positive momentum in the aerospace and defense sector. Zacks ETF Rank #2 (Buy).
Diversified exposure to 48 U.S. aerospace and defense companies with significant holdings in LMT, RTX, BA, and GD; Zacks Rank #2 (Buy)
ITA is highlighted as an alternative with the lowest expense ratio (0.37%) among the three compared ETFs and the largest asset base ($12.79 billion), making it an attractive option for cost-conscious investors.
Offers diversified exposure to 48 U.S. aerospace and defense companies with major holdings in RTX, LMT, and NOC; gained 8.5% year-to-date with Zacks ETF Rank #2 (Buy).
Lower expense ratio (0.37%), higher 1-year performance (27.2%), and better for investors seeking concentrated exposure to major defense primes. However, high concentration risk is a concern.
Held its close price with minimal movement, suggesting modest overall sector response.
ETF holds RKLB as a position; company's defense contract wins are positive for the fund's aerospace and defense holdings, but no specific ETF-level news mentioned.
Mentioned as a related holding but no specific performance analysis or commentary provided in the article; included for reference only.
Market-cap weighted approach concentrates nearly 50% in three companies (GE Aerospace, RTX, Boeing), creating vulnerability to individual company risks despite sector tailwinds.
Down 0.25% as the aerospace and defense sector experiences weakness alongside broader industrial underperformance on Monday.
Minimal price movement (-0.05%) reflects the mixed performance of its heavy LMT weighting, suggesting market uncertainty about the sector despite the Peru contract win.
Articles and sentiment ratings from Massive / Polygon. Sentiment is the provider's model rating for this company, not Gainbot's view.
Sources: Massive / Polygon daily aggregates (split-adjusted) · SEC filings via Massive · FINRA settlements via Massive · Financial Modeling Prep. Figures are dated where shown; research is informational, not investment advice. Methodology