iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF news

Highlighted as an alternative with the largest asset base ($109.70 billion) among the three compared funds, indicating strong investor confidence and scale, though with a slightly higher expense ratio (0.06%).

Highlighted as an alternative option with low expense ratio (0.06%) and the largest asset base among alternatives mentioned ($107.89 billion), representing a traditional, cost-effective small-cap investment choice.

IJR is presented as a solid alternative for active traders and those seeking stability, offering significantly larger AUM ($108B vs $23.3B) for tighter bid-ask spreads, a profitability screen that reduces volatility, and greater liquidity despite its higher 0.06% expense ratio.

Slightly favored choice due to profitability requirements for holdings (safer during recessions), more balanced sector distribution across 641 stocks, and comparable low costs and returns. Better suited for diversified small-cap exposure.

IJR is presented as a viable alternative with its own merits: higher 1-year returns (31.5%), more concentrated portfolio (640 holdings), and focus on higher-quality small caps with stronger financial viability requirements. However, it has higher fees (0.06%) and lower 5-year performance, making it neither clearly superior nor inferior, but rather a different strategic approach.

IJR offers lower volatility, reduced maximum drawdown (28% vs 30.8%), substantial AUM ($102.9B), quality-focused screening, and higher dividend yield (1.2%), making it suitable for risk-averse investors prioritizing stability.

Strong performance with 37.1% one-year return, significantly larger AUM ($102.9B) providing high liquidity, lower max drawdown (28.0%) due to quality filtering of profitable companies, and better resilience during downturns. Ideal for active traders and risk-conscious investors.

Mentioned as another alternative option with the largest asset base ($107.55 billion) among the three compared funds, but with a slightly higher expense ratio (0.06%) than VB, though still competitive.

Positioned as the most cost-effective alternative with the lowest expense ratio (0.06%) and the largest asset base ($105.69 billion), making it attractive for investors seeking cheaper, lower-risk options.

Presented as a competitive alternative with very low expense ratio (0.06%), substantial assets ($106B), and recommended for cost-conscious investors preferring traditional indexing strategies.

Highlighted as a competitive alternative with very low expense ratio (0.06%) and the largest asset base ($109.12B) among the alternatives mentioned, offering cheaper and lower-risk exposure.

Lowest expense ratio among the three (0.06%), largest asset base ($109.94 billion), and tracks similar small-cap index, positioning it as the most cost-efficient option for small-cap exposure.

Highlighted as a competitive alternative with low expense ratio (0.06%) and substantial assets ($107.89 billion), offering cheaper exposure to the same small-cap segment.

Mentioned as another competitive alternative with low expense ratio of 0.06% and the largest asset base of $107.89 billion among the three compared ETFs, providing strong liquidity and cost-effectiveness.

Presented as another attractive alternative with very low expense ratio (0.06%) and the largest asset base ($109.25 billion) among the three compared funds, offering lower-cost, lower-risk traditional indexing.

Presented as a competitive alternative with low expense ratio (0.06%) and the largest asset base ($110.1 billion) among the alternatives mentioned, making it attractive for cost-conscious investors.

Highlighted as a competitive alternative with the lowest expense ratio (0.06%) and the largest asset base ($110.10 billion) among the three compared ETFs, positioning it as the most attractive option.

Listed as an alternative option with the largest asset base ($110.91 billion) but a slightly higher expense ratio (0.06%), with no additional performance metrics or ratings provided.

Highlighted as a competitive alternative with the lowest expense ratio (0.06%) and the largest asset base ($110.91 billion) among the three compared ETFs.

Attracted approximately $2 billion in inflows; applies profitability screens to constituents, creating higher-quality portfolio composition that appeals to selective investors

Recommended as a higher-quality small-cap option with $2.1 billion in net inflows year-to-date, indicating growing investor interest in small-cap exposure.

Tracks the S&P 600 and benefits from improving small-cap fundamentals. Trading at a discount P/E ratio of 18 with improving earnings growth forecasts, positioning it favorably for potential outperformance over the next couple of years.