NYSE Arca · FDVV

Fidelity High Dividend ETF news

$61.32−0.62%
Close Sep 28, 2026 · split-adjusted
Articles · 30 days3English, de-duplicated
Positive3100% of coverage
Neutral00%
Negative00% of coverage

About Fidelity High Dividend ETF

Vanguard vs. Fidelity: Is VIG or FDVV the Better Buy for Dividend Investors?
The Motley FoolAug 24, 11:20 AM ETNeutral

Presented as a viable alternative with merits for certain investors seeking higher current income (2.7% yield) and lower valuation (P/E of 19), but noted as having higher expense ratio (0.15%), concentrated holdings (119 stocks), and heavy tech sector exposure (29%), making it less ideal for long-term growth-focused investors.

Which Is the Better High Dividend ETF, iShares' HDV or Fidelity's FDVV?
The Motley FoolJul 4, 5:05 PM ET▲ Positive

Positioned favorably for growth-oriented investors seeking total returns, delivering superior 5-year performance ($1,883 vs $1,673) and exposure to high-growth tech stocks, though with higher expense ratio (0.15%) and volatility (beta 0.86).

Dividend ETFs: How SCHD and FDVV Measure Up
The Motley FoolJun 22, 11:05 AM ET▲ Positive

Praised for stronger five-year total returns ($1,887 vs $1,520) and better long-term performance (13.4% CAGR). Recommended for growth-oriented investors willing to accept higher volatility and tech sector concentration.

FDVV vs. HDV: Which Dividend Stock ETF is a Better Buy?
The Motley FoolMay 16, 1:15 PM ET▼ Negative

Despite strong recent performance (18.8% annual returns over 3 years), the fund is criticized for holding a tech-heavy portfolio (26.7% in Information Technology) with low-dividend stocks like Nvidia (0.02% yield), Apple (0.36%), and Microsoft (0.90%), making it misaligned with dividend investment strategy and vulnerable to tech sector downturns.

Higher Yield or Long-Term Dividend Growth? FDVV vs. NOBL
The Motley FoolApr 29, 2:04 PM ET▲ Positive

FDVV demonstrates superior recent performance with 29.8% one-year return, higher dividend yield of 3.0%, and lower expense ratio of 0.15%. Strong 5-year growth ($1,000 became $1,883) and cost efficiency make it attractive for income-focused investors seeking current returns.

The FDVV ETF Delivers Higher 5-Year Growth Than the HDV ETF
The Motley FoolApr 24, 11:21 AM ET▲ Positive

FDVV delivered notably stronger 5-year and 1-year returns compared to HDV, with a 66.5% 3-year return including dividends. Its technology and financial sector exposure has driven superior growth, and it offers exposure to high-growth dividend payers like Microsoft and Nvidia.

Fidelity (FDVV) vs. ProShares (NOBL): Which Dividend ETF Reigns Supreme?
The Motley FoolMar 15, 5:18 PM ET▲ Positive

FDVV demonstrates superior performance metrics including lower expense ratio (0.15%), higher dividend yield (2.77%), and stronger 1-year returns (16.5%). However, sentiment is moderated as the author personally favors NOBL for their portfolio needs.

Also mentions FDVV

Articles that tag FDVV but are mainly about other companies.

1 Top Dividend ETF Worth Loading Up On With $1,000 Right Now
The Motley FoolSep 18, 6:15 AM ET▲ Positive

Recommended as a strong buy with above-average dividend yield (2.6%), solid 10-year average annual return of 13.5%, and unique growth-plus-income profile that positions it well for outperformance given expected strong corporate earnings growth.

Here Are the Smartest Dividend ETFs You Can Buy With $100
The Motley FoolJun 17, 12:21 PM ET▲ Positive

Highlighted as a smart investment vehicle with low 0.15% expense ratio, strong 3-year performance, and exposure to quality dividend-paying tech stocks like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft.

The Top 4 ETF Strategies for New Investors
The Motley FoolMay 24, 1:01 PM ET▲ Positive

Mentioned as one of the three most successful dividend ETFs in 2026, highlighting its effectiveness as an income-producing investment with low expense ratios.

Articles and sentiment ratings from Massive / Polygon. Sentiment is the provider's model rating for this company, not Gainbot's view.

Sources: Massive / Polygon daily aggregates (split-adjusted) · SEC filings via Massive · FINRA settlements via Massive · Financial Modeling Prep. Figures are dated where shown; research is informational, not investment advice. Methodology