Both in Banking & Credit
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT vs Franklin Financial Services
Over the past year RM returned −23.7% and FRAF returned +34.8%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.32.
RM −23.7% FRAF +34.8%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | RM | FRAF |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $30.57 | $62.47 |
| Market cap | $282.0M | $281.1M |
| Today | +0.46% | −0.45% |
| 1 month | −6.1% | +0.7% |
| 6 months | −3.7% | +21.1% |
| Year to date | −21.1% | +24.4% |
| 1 year | −26.0% | +30.5% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +6.0% | +1.1% |
| Gross margin | 85.7% | 71.9% |
| Net margin | 5.1% | 19.4% |
| P/E (TTM) | 6.0× | 11.4× |
| Price / sales | 0.4× | 2.1× |
| Net cash | -$1.53B | $446.3M |
| Dividend yield | 3.93% | 2.18% |
| Volatility (60d) | 64.2% | 19.9% |
| Short % of float | 4.5% | 5.1% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).