Both in Materials Manufacturing
Core Molding Technologies vs Vera Bradley
Over the past year CMT returned +21.1% and VRA returned +148.2%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.17.
CMT +21.1% VRA +148.2%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | CMT | VRA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $22.19 | $6.38 |
| Market cap | $196.4M | $183.0M |
| Today | −2.59% | +4.93% |
| 1 month | −1.4% | +49.4% |
| 6 months | −19.0% | +57.5% |
| Year to date | +10.7% | +163.6% |
| 1 year | +22.4% | +192.7% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | −20.8% | +1.1% |
| Gross margin | 20.3% | 59.8% |
| Net margin | 2.8% | 6.3% |
| P/E (TTM) | 26.7× | — |
| Price / sales | 0.8× | 0.7× |
| Net cash | $12.1M | $34.2M |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 34.0% | 78.9% |
| Short % of float | 2.8% | 4.2% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).