Both in Securities & Investments
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
Over the past year XMLV returned +1.1% and PCEF returned −2.9%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.20.
XMLV +1.1% PCEF −2.9%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | XMLV | PCEF |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $63.82 | $19.32 |
| Market cap | $698.2M | $770.9M |
| Today | −0.64% | −1.02% |
| 1 month | −5.8% | −5.2% |
| 6 months | +2.8% | +5.1% |
| Year to date | +2.3% | −2.8% |
| 1 year | +1.8% | −2.9% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +20.5% | +20.5% |
| Gross margin | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Net margin | 18.9% | 18.9% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 0.1× | 0.1× |
| Net cash | $746.0M | $746.0M |
| Dividend yield | 3.12% | 7.14% |
| Volatility (60d) | 9.7% | 8.6% |
| Short % of float | — | — |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).