Both in Securities & Investments
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
Over the past year XMLV returned +6.5% and CGW returned +2.5%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.62.
XMLV +6.5% CGW +2.5%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | XMLV | CGW |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $67.00 | $65.99 |
| Market cap | $733.6M | $1.07B |
| Today | +1.11% | +1.84% |
| 1 month | +5.6% | +3.1% |
| 6 months | +3.0% | +3.2% |
| Year to date | +7.4% | +4.7% |
| 1 year | +7.9% | +3.1% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +14.2% | +14.2% |
| Gross margin | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Net margin | 15.7% | 15.7% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 0.1× | 0.1× |
| Net cash | -$315.8M | -$315.8M |
| Dividend yield | 2.98% | 1.51% |
| Volatility (60d) | 11.2% | 15.1% |
| Short % of float | — | — |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).