Both in Banking & Credit
TeraWulf vs Hancock Whitney
Over the past year WULF returned −24.3% and HWC returned +26.1%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.10.
WULF −24.3% HWC +26.1%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | WULF | HWC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $11.73 | $71.99 |
| Market cap | $5.85B | $5.78B |
| Today | −8.00% | −0.85% |
| 1 month | −21.3% | +0.1% |
| 6 months | −45.0% | +7.2% |
| Year to date | +2.1% | +13.0% |
| 1 year | −19.1% | +27.8% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | −6.0% | +4.0% |
| Gross margin | 72.3% | 77.0% |
| Net margin | −2099.6% | 24.4% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | 13.5× |
| Price / sales | 35.4× | 2.9× |
| Net cash | -$2.65B | $7.21B |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.78% |
| Volatility (60d) | 84.3% | 17.0% |
| Short % of float | 37.4% | 8.1% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).