Both in Banking & Credit
UWM Holdings vs Plumas Bancorp
Over the past year UWMC returned −80.1% and PLBC returned +43.3%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.16.
UWMC −80.1% PLBC +43.3%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | UWMC | PLBC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.24 | $61.57 |
| Market cap | $427.4M | $428.5M |
| Today | −0.80% | −1.24% |
| 1 month | −16.8% | −0.4% |
| 6 months | −64.3% | +27.2% |
| Year to date | −71.7% | +37.8% |
| 1 year | −80.1% | +40.0% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +17.0% | +44.0% |
| Gross margin | 91.9% | 86.9% |
| Net margin | −9.1% | 30.1% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | 12.0× |
| Price / sales | 0.2× | 3.3× |
| Net cash | -$15.28B | $585.5M |
| Dividend yield | 32.26% | 2.14% |
| Volatility (60d) | 106.2% | 16.5% |
| Short % of float | 24.9% | 4.7% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).