Both in Banking & Credit
UWM Holdings vs Civista Bancshares
Over the past year UWMC returned −70.8% and CIVB returned +34.9%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.18.
UWMC −70.8% CIVB +34.9%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | UWMC | CIVB |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.69 | $28.81 |
| Market cap | $583.2M | $596.7M |
| Today | +6.29% | +1.19% |
| 1 month | +40.8% | +7.9% |
| 6 months | −51.6% | +15.2% |
| Year to date | −61.4% | +29.7% |
| 1 year | −71.1% | +33.4% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +17.0% | +4.3% |
| Gross margin | 91.9% | 72.6% |
| Net margin | −9.1% | 21.8% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | 11.0× |
| Price / sales | 0.2× | 2.3× |
| Net cash | -$15.28B | $535.9M |
| Dividend yield | 23.67% | 2.50% |
| Volatility (60d) | 81.5% | 19.0% |
| Short % of float | 27.3% | 3.6% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).