Both in Banking & Credit
UWM Holdings vs Bankwell Financial Group
Over the past year UWMC returned −73.8% and BWFG returned +51.1%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.18.
UWMC −73.8% BWFG +51.1%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | UWMC | BWFG |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.53 | $66.36 |
| Market cap | $528.0M | $529.0M |
| Today | −1.92% | −0.72% |
| 1 month | +23.4% | +1.6% |
| 6 months | −55.9% | +26.3% |
| Year to date | −65.1% | +44.8% |
| 1 year | −73.8% | +49.9% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +17.0% | +9.6% |
| Gross margin | 91.9% | 59.1% |
| Net margin | −9.1% | 21.9% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | 12.5× |
| Price / sales | 0.2× | 2.4× |
| Net cash | -$15.28B | $312.3M |
| Dividend yield | 26.14% | 1.21% |
| Volatility (60d) | 122.3% | 15.5% |
| Short % of float | 25.5% | 10.5% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).