Both in Banking & Credit
USBC vs Canton Strategic Holdings
Over the past year USBC returned −0.8% and CNTN returned −60.6%; their daily moves had a correlation of -0.47.
USBC −0.8% CNTN −60.6%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | USBC | CNTN |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4095 | $1.95 |
| Market cap | $158.9M | $155.4M |
| Today | −6.03% | −4.88% |
| 1 month | −23.9% | −10.8% |
| 6 months | +8.8% | — |
| Year to date | −35.5% | — |
| 1 year | −58.6% | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | — |
| Gross margin | — | 100.0% |
| Net margin | — | −1287.2% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | — | — |
| Net cash | -$12.0M | $37.2M |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 89.8% | — |
| Short % of float | 1.5% | 10.6% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).