Both in Testing Laboratories
UL Solutions vs NeoGenomics
Over the past year ULS returned −7.7% and NEO returned +148.3%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.10.
ULS −7.7% NEO +148.3%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | ULS | NEO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $64.80 | $19.29 |
| Market cap | $13.08B | $2.48B |
| Today | −1.89% | −0.21% |
| 1 month | −14.2% | +3.5% |
| 6 months | −22.8% | +168.3% |
| Year to date | −17.8% | +64.0% |
| 1 year | −5.4% | +145.3% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.2% | +11.2% |
| Gross margin | 51.1% | 45.6% |
| Net margin | 30.1% | 1.1% |
| P/E (TTM) | 25.9× | — |
| Price / sales | 4.2× | 3.2× |
| Net cash | $133.0M | -$234.4M |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 43.0% | 52.9% |
| Short % of float | 7.1% | 13.3% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).