Both in Materials Manufacturing
Smith-Midland vs INNOVATE
Over the past year SMID returned −31.7% and VATE returned +4.9%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.07.
SMID −31.7% VATE +4.9%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | SMID | VATE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $25.03 | $5.51 |
| Market cap | $132.8M | $75.1M |
| Today | +5.21% | −1.87% |
| 1 month | +12.0% | −23.4% |
| 6 months | −27.7% | −55.6% |
| Year to date | −31.1% | +21.8% |
| 1 year | −31.7% | +4.9% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | −10.8% | +74.2% |
| Gross margin | 23.2% | 18.9% |
| Net margin | 5.9% | 2.5% |
| P/E (TTM) | 17.2× | — |
| Price / sales | 1.5× | 0.0× |
| Net cash | $6.5M | -$528.2M |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 34.1% | 53.2% |
| Short % of float | 4.7% | 14.1% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).