Both in Securities & Investments

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF

Over the past year RWK returned +12.5% and PWZ returned −6.7%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.37.

RWK +12.5% PWZ −6.7%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
MetricRWKPWZ
Price$140.52$22.31
Market cap$1.27B$1.15B
Today−0.64%−0.58%
1 month−5.6%−6.3%
6 months+11.8%−6.0%
Year to date+11.1%−7.7%
1 year+13.0%−6.5%
Revenue growth (YoY)+20.5%+20.5%
Gross margin100.0%100.0%
Net margin18.9%18.9%
P/E (TTM)——
Price / sales0.2×0.2×
Net cash$746.0M$746.0M
Dividend yield1.16%3.91%
Volatility (60d)12.5%5.4%
Short % of float——
Next earnings——

Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).

RWK vs PWZ: Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF Stock Comparison | Gainbot