Both in Securities & Investments
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF vs Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
Over the past year RWK returned +17.8% and PWZ returned −4.9%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.40.
RWK +17.8% PWZ −4.9%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | RWK | PWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $145.53 | $23.09 |
| Market cap | $1.32B | $1.19B |
| Today | −0.07% | +0.35% |
| 1 month | +3.8% | +3.2% |
| 6 months | +4.8% | −4.7% |
| Year to date | +15.1% | −4.4% |
| 1 year | +16.9% | −4.7% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +20.5% | +20.5% |
| Gross margin | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Net margin | 18.9% | 18.9% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 0.2× | 0.2× |
| Net cash | $746.0M | $746.0M |
| Dividend yield | 1.12% | 4.07% |
| Volatility (60d) | 11.7% | 7.0% |
| Short % of float | — | — |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).