Both in Surgical Instruments
Retractable Technologies vs Cytosorbents
Over the past year RVP returned −36.2% and CTSO returned −70.9%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.03.
RVP −36.2% CTSO −70.9%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | RVP | CTSO |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5620 | $4.54 |
| Market cap | $16.8M | $14.3M |
| Today | −0.71% | +10.19% |
| 1 month | −19.2% | +14.5% |
| 6 months | −22.4% | −62.5% |
| Year to date | −27.2% | −64.5% |
| 1 year | −36.0% | −71.4% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | −31.1% | +0.2% |
| Gross margin | 2.7% | 73.2% |
| Net margin | 38.5% | −45.9% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 0.5× | 0.4× |
| Net cash | $39.2M | -$12.8M |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 26.0% | 881.4% |
| Short % of float | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).