Both in Securities & Investments
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
Over the past year PWZ returned −6.7% and CGW returned −2.0%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.47.
PWZ −6.7% CGW −2.0%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | PWZ | CGW |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $22.31 | $62.35 |
| Market cap | $1.15B | $1.01B |
| Today | −0.58% | −0.77% |
| 1 month | −6.3% | −4.6% |
| 6 months | −6.0% | 0.0% |
| Year to date | −7.7% | −1.0% |
| 1 year | −6.5% | −0.4% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +20.5% | +20.5% |
| Gross margin | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Net margin | 18.9% | 18.9% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 0.2× | 0.1× |
| Net cash | $746.0M | $746.0M |
| Dividend yield | 3.91% | 1.60% |
| Volatility (60d) | 5.4% | 12.0% |
| Short % of float | — | — |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).