Both in Banking & Credit
Plumas Bancorp vs UWM Holdings
Over the past year PLBC returned +43.3% and UWMC returned −80.1%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.16.
PLBC +43.3% UWMC −80.1%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | PLBC | UWMC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $61.57 | $1.24 |
| Market cap | $428.5M | $427.4M |
| Today | −1.24% | −0.80% |
| 1 month | −0.4% | −16.8% |
| 6 months | +27.2% | −64.3% |
| Year to date | +37.8% | −71.7% |
| 1 year | +40.0% | −80.1% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +44.0% | +17.0% |
| Gross margin | 86.9% | 91.9% |
| Net margin | 30.1% | −9.1% |
| P/E (TTM) | 12.0× | — |
| Price / sales | 3.3× | 0.2× |
| Net cash | $585.5M | -$15.28B |
| Dividend yield | 2.14% | 32.26% |
| Volatility (60d) | 16.5% | 106.2% |
| Short % of float | 4.7% | 24.9% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).