Both in Mining & Metals
MP Materials vs Cleveland-Cliffs
Over the past year MP returned −33.4% and CLF returned −14.3%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.30.
MP −33.4% CLF −14.3%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | MP | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $45.43 | $11.01 |
| Market cap | $8.09B | $6.28B |
| Today | −2.20% | −1.87% |
| 1 month | −19.1% | −5.2% |
| 6 months | −0.4% | +35.8% |
| Year to date | −10.1% | −17.1% |
| 1 year | −33.8% | −11.0% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +119.7% | +5.9% |
| Gross margin | 42.7% | 2.5% |
| Net margin | −16.1% | −2.8% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 19.4× | 0.3× |
| Net cash | $518.1M | -$7.63B |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 64.6% | 60.6% |
| Short % of float | 23.5% | 14.2% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).