Both in Mining & Metals
MP Materials vs Peabody Energy
Over the past year MP returned −37.3% and BTU returned −19.1%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.33.
MP −37.3% BTU −19.1%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | MP | BTU |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $39.57 | $22.18 |
| Market cap | $7.05B | $2.70B |
| Today | −4.97% | −0.22% |
| 1 month | −14.1% | −10.3% |
| 6 months | −40.6% | −16.4% |
| Year to date | −21.7% | −25.3% |
| 1 year | −38.5% | −17.9% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +119.7% | +12.7% |
| Gross margin | 42.7% | 100.0% |
| Net margin | −16.1% | −9.0% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 16.9× | 0.7× |
| Net cash | $518.1M | $187.3M |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.35% |
| Volatility (60d) | 56.8% | 47.9% |
| Short % of float | 25.3% | 9.8% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).