Both in Business Services
Liquidity Services vs The Western Union
Over the past year LQDT returned +102.3% and WU returned −27.0%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.05.
LQDT +102.3% WU −27.0%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | LQDT | WU |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $46.76 | $6.59 |
| Market cap | $1.47B | $2.06B |
| Today | +5.36% | +5.44% |
| 1 month | +12.6% | +7.3% |
| 6 months | +25.6% | −26.7% |
| Year to date | +54.3% | −29.2% |
| 1 year | +98.1% | −27.6% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.1% | −1.3% |
| Gross margin | 49.3% | 33.2% |
| Net margin | 8.0% | 7.6% |
| P/E (TTM) | 44.1× | 5.2× |
| Price / sales | 3.0× | 0.5× |
| Net cash | $231.1M | -$1.78B |
| Dividend yield | — | 14.26% |
| Volatility (60d) | 28.4% | 32.8% |
| Short % of float | 4.9% | 20.6% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).