Both in Mining & Metals
Hycroft Mining Holding vs Peabody Energy
Over the past year HYMC returned +128.1% and BTU returned −42.1%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.19.
HYMC +128.1% BTU −42.1%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | HYMC | BTU |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $17.47 | $17.02 |
| Market cap | $1.63B | $2.07B |
| Today | +8.58% | −17.62% |
| 1 month | −8.5% | −33.1% |
| 6 months | −56.1% | −31.8% |
| Year to date | −26.5% | −42.7% |
| 1 year | +116.7% | −43.2% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +12.7% |
| Gross margin | — | 100.0% |
| Net margin | — | −9.0% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | — | 0.5× |
| Net cash | $211.2M | $187.3M |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.76% |
| Volatility (60d) | 76.7% | 62.1% |
| Short % of float | 23.2% | 9.8% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).