Both in Banking & Credit
F.N.B. vs TeraWulf
Over the past year FNB returned +17.7% and WULF returned −22.1%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.17.
FNB +17.7% WULF −22.1%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | FNB | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $18.45 | $11.70 |
| Market cap | $6.51B | $5.84B |
| Today | +1.10% | −6.62% |
| 1 month | +6.8% | −21.8% |
| 6 months | +1.4% | −54.5% |
| Year to date | +7.9% | +1.8% |
| 1 year | +17.3% | −27.3% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.1% | −6.0% |
| Gross margin | 68.6% | 72.3% |
| Net margin | 22.1% | −2099.6% |
| P/E (TTM) | 10.8× | — |
| Price / sales | 2.4× | 35.3× |
| Net cash | $5.70B | -$2.65B |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 19.7% | 90.0% |
| Short % of float | 6.5% | 37.4% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).