Both in Oil & Gas Extraction
Diamondback Energy vs EQT
Over the past year FANG returned +31.2% and EQT returned −6.0%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.37.
FANG +31.2% EQT −6.0%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | FANG | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $182.88 | $52.52 |
| Market cap | $51.21B | $32.85B |
| Today | −4.92% | −3.19% |
| 1 month | −1.1% | +0.1% |
| 6 months | −6.3% | −8.4% |
| Year to date | +21.7% | −2.0% |
| 1 year | +29.5% | −6.0% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +51.2% | −8.4% |
| Gross margin | 86.9% | 72.3% |
| Net margin | 33.8% | 16.7% |
| P/E (TTM) | 34.9× | 12.4× |
| Price / sales | 3.0× | 3.5× |
| Net cash | -$12.15B | -$5.56B |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 1.29% |
| Volatility (60d) | 34.7% | 25.8% |
| Short % of float | 3.2% | 3.5% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).