Both in Construction
Energy Services of America vs Cardinal Infrastructure Group
Over the past year ESOA returned −0.6% and CDNL returned −36.5%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.31.
ESOA −0.6% CDNL −36.5%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | ESOA | CDNL |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.73 | $14.93 |
| Market cap | $162.9M | $320.0M |
| Today | −5.62% | −4.96% |
| 1 month | −22.8% | −48.0% |
| 6 months | −50.8% | −72.5% |
| Year to date | +6.9% | −38.3% |
| 1 year | −22.5% | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +25.5% | — |
| Gross margin | 11.0% | 15.9% |
| Net margin | 2.5% | 2.1% |
| P/E (TTM) | 15.6× | — |
| Price / sales | 0.3× | — |
| Net cash | -$30.7M | $134.5M |
| Dividend yield | 1.83% | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 39.7% | 90.6% |
| Short % of float | 3.5% | 14.8% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).