Both in Oil & Gas Extraction
EQT vs Diamondback Energy
Over the past year EQT returned +4.8% and FANG returned +43.6%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.35.
EQT +4.8% FANG +43.6%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | EQT | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $56.36 | $207.35 |
| Market cap | $35.25B | $58.06B |
| Today | +0.15% | +1.40% |
| 1 month | +15.3% | +12.7% |
| 6 months | −4.7% | +1.0% |
| Year to date | +5.1% | +37.9% |
| 1 year | +4.8% | +43.6% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | −29.2% | +51.2% |
| Gross margin | 73.2% | 86.9% |
| Net margin | 11.7% | 33.8% |
| P/E (TTM) | 13.0× | 39.5× |
| Price / sales | 3.7× | 3.4× |
| Net cash | -$5.65B | -$12.15B |
| Dividend yield | 1.17% | 2.12% |
| Volatility (60d) | 26.3% | 32.5% |
| Short % of float | 3.5% | 3.5% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).