Both in Oil & Gas Extraction
Evolution Petroleum vs Mammoth Energy Services
Over the past year EPM returned −28.5% and TUSK returned +19.2%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.20.
EPM −28.5% TUSK +19.2%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | EPM | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.49 | $2.85 |
| Market cap | $140.2M | $137.2M |
| Today | +1.16% | −2.06% |
| 1 month | −4.1% | −7.8% |
| 6 months | −25.3% | +8.8% |
| Year to date | −1.4% | +54.1% |
| 1 year | −29.9% | +17.3% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +14.7% | +110.9% |
| Gross margin | 47.2% | 26.3% |
| Net margin | 19.1% | −2.9% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 1.6× | — |
| Net cash | -$50.4M | $77.0M |
| Dividend yield | 13.75% | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 48.4% | 53.2% |
| Short % of float | 9.6% | 0.3% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).