Both in Electric, Gas & Water Utilities
Chesapeake Utilities vs California Water Service
Over the past year CPK returned +5.3% and CWT returned +7.8%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.57.
CPK +5.3% CWT +7.8%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | CPK | CWT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $136.41 | $48.50 |
| Market cap | $3.44B | $3.05B |
| Today | +0.63% | +1.85% |
| 1 month | +9.7% | +7.7% |
| 6 months | +7.5% | +14.5% |
| Year to date | +9.3% | +11.9% |
| 1 year | +6.1% | +2.2% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.7% | +6.7% |
| Gross margin | 74.4% | 100.0% |
| Net margin | 12.6% | 19.7% |
| P/E (TTM) | 22.9× | 22.2× |
| Price / sales | 3.4× | 2.8× |
| Net cash | -$1.70B | -$1.63B |
| Dividend yield | 2.16% | 2.76% |
| Volatility (60d) | 17.6% | 18.6% |
| Short % of float | 4.0% | 3.8% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).