Both in Mining & Metals
Core Natural Resources vs Peabody Energy
Over the past year CNR returned +3.0% and BTU returned −30.0%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.79.
CNR +3.0% BTU −30.0%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | CNR | BTU |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.15 | $20.97 |
| Market cap | $4.18B | $2.56B |
| Today | −0.12% | −0.38% |
| 1 month | −7.5% | −17.8% |
| 6 months | −4.8% | −16.1% |
| Year to date | −4.9% | −29.4% |
| 1 year | +6.5% | −23.5% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +3.5% | +12.7% |
| Gross margin | 22.1% | 100.0% |
| Net margin | 11.1% | −9.0% |
| P/E (TTM) | 41.7× | — |
| Price / sales | 1.0× | 0.6× |
| Net cash | $25.6M | $187.3M |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 1.43% |
| Volatility (60d) | 31.6% | 48.3% |
| Short % of float | 3.3% | 9.8% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).