Both in Mining & Metals
Cleveland-Cliffs vs MP Materials
Over the past year CLF returned +20.2% and MP returned −33.5%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.28.
CLF +20.2% MP −33.5%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | CLF | MP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $14.27 | $38.35 |
| Market cap | $8.14B | $6.83B |
| Today | +0.14% | −3.08% |
| 1 month | +26.1% | −18.4% |
| 6 months | +39.2% | −42.1% |
| Year to date | +7.5% | −24.1% |
| 1 year | +16.4% | −40.9% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.5% | +119.7% |
| Gross margin | 8.3% | 42.7% |
| Net margin | 2.7% | −16.1% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 0.4× | 16.4× |
| Net cash | -$7.57B | $518.1M |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 60.5% | 54.9% |
| Short % of float | 13.5% | 25.3% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).