Both in Mining & Metals
Cleveland-Cliffs vs Peabody Energy
Over the past year CLF returned +14.6% and BTU returned −19.1%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.19.
CLF +14.6% BTU −19.1%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | CLF | BTU |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $14.25 | $22.18 |
| Market cap | $8.13B | $2.70B |
| Today | −0.07% | −0.22% |
| 1 month | +24.2% | −10.3% |
| 6 months | +35.6% | −16.4% |
| Year to date | +7.3% | −25.3% |
| 1 year | +1.1% | −17.9% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.5% | +12.7% |
| Gross margin | 8.3% | 100.0% |
| Net margin | 2.7% | −9.0% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 0.4× | 0.7× |
| Net cash | -$7.57B | $187.3M |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.35% |
| Volatility (60d) | 60.5% | 47.9% |
| Short % of float | 13.5% | 9.8% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).