Both in Securities & Investments
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
Over the past year CGW returned −2.0% and PWZ returned −6.7%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.47.
CGW −2.0% PWZ −6.7%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | CGW | PWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $62.35 | $22.31 |
| Market cap | $1.01B | $1.15B |
| Today | −0.77% | −0.58% |
| 1 month | −4.6% | −6.3% |
| 6 months | 0.0% | −6.0% |
| Year to date | −1.0% | −7.7% |
| 1 year | −0.4% | −6.5% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +20.5% | +20.5% |
| Gross margin | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Net margin | 18.9% | 18.9% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 0.1× | 0.2× |
| Net cash | $746.0M | $746.0M |
| Dividend yield | 1.60% | 3.91% |
| Volatility (60d) | 12.0% | 5.4% |
| Short % of float | — | — |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).