Both in Securities & Investments
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
Over the past year CGW returned +2.1% and PWZ returned −4.6%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.44.
CGW +2.1% PWZ −4.6%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | CGW | PWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $64.67 | $23.11 |
| Market cap | $1.05B | $1.23B |
| Today | −0.93% | +0.04% |
| 1 month | +1.5% | +3.5% |
| 6 months | +0.2% | −4.3% |
| Year to date | +2.6% | −4.3% |
| 1 year | +1.5% | −4.8% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +20.5% | +20.5% |
| Gross margin | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Net margin | 18.9% | 18.9% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 0.2× | 0.2× |
| Net cash | $746.0M | $746.0M |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 4.06% |
| Volatility (60d) | 12.9% | 6.9% |
| Short % of float | — | — |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).