Both in Construction
Cardinal Infrastructure Group vs Energy Services of America
Over the past year CDNL returned −46.4% and ESOA returned −3.1%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.31.
CDNL −46.4% ESOA −3.1%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | CDNL | ESOA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $12.59 | $8.51 |
| Market cap | $269.8M | $158.8M |
| Today | −15.71% | −2.52% |
| 1 month | −51.7% | −18.5% |
| 6 months | −75.5% | −50.6% |
| Year to date | −48.0% | +4.2% |
| 1 year | — | −21.0% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +25.5% |
| Gross margin | 15.9% | 11.0% |
| Net margin | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| P/E (TTM) | — | 15.2× |
| Price / sales | — | 0.3× |
| Net cash | $134.5M | -$30.7M |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.88% |
| Volatility (60d) | 95.5% | 39.6% |
| Short % of float | 14.8% | 3.5% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).