Both in Mining & Metals
Peabody Energy vs Hycroft Mining Holding
Over the past year BTU returned −23.3% and HYMC returned +176.3%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.23.
BTU −23.3% HYMC +176.3%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | BTU | HYMC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $24.85 | $17.96 |
| Market cap | $3.03B | $1.67B |
| Today | −2.28% | −5.92% |
| 1 month | −15.6% | −21.8% |
| 6 months | −17.7% | −51.5% |
| Year to date | −16.3% | −24.4% |
| 1 year | −20.6% | +180.2% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.7% | — |
| Gross margin | 100.0% | — |
| Net margin | −9.0% | — |
| P/E (TTM) | — | — |
| Price / sales | 0.8× | — |
| Net cash | $187.3M | $220.5M |
| Dividend yield | 1.21% | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 51.7% | 84.7% |
| Short % of float | 10.1% | 23.7% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).