Both in Restaurants & Hospitality
ARAMARK vs Brinker International
Over the past year ARMK returned +38.8% and EAT returned +110.8%; their daily moves had a correlation of 0.04.
ARMK +38.8% EAT +110.8%Growth of $1, one year, split-adjusted
| Metric | ARMK | EAT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $52.33 | $220.44 |
| Market cap | $13.80B | $9.16B |
| Today | −4.18% | +6.28% |
| 1 month | −5.6% | +15.8% |
| 6 months | +14.3% | +49.8% |
| Year to date | +42.0% | +53.6% |
| 1 year | +39.2% | +109.8% |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.3% | +9.4% |
| Gross margin | 8.5% | 43.3% |
| Net margin | 1.9% | 7.7% |
| P/E (TTM) | 36.0× | 18.3× |
| Price / sales | 0.7× | 1.5× |
| Net cash | -$5.63B | -$420.3M |
| Dividend yield | 0.92% | — |
| Volatility (60d) | 25.4% | 52.9% |
| Short % of float | 3.1% | 11.7% |
| Next earnings | — | — |
Shading marks the stronger figure where one clearly exists (lower is better for valuation and volatility).